Relief, Politics, and Leaders: Issues in South Asia
Relief, Politics, and Leaders: Issues in South Asia
The Indian Ocean tsunami left over 2,00,000 dead and thousands of costal communities destroyed. In response, governments, charity organizations, and international organizations pledged billions of dollars in emergency aid and long-term recovery to affected countries. This sudden flow of large amounts of money, goods and services to the affected region has, however, led to widespread fear amongst communities of becoming victims of politicisation as powerful groups attempt to further political or institutional agendas.
Humanitarian aid, long-term disaster recovery, and even development processes are clearly and intimately related to political processes and are consequently exposed to the risks of politicisation. Though such politicisation of humanitarian aid is primarily related to the national or state government policies of the aid recipient countries, NGOs, bilateral and multilateral donor communities can also become part of it.
Politicisation of humanitarian aid is not a natural phenomenon, but constructed through the realization of vested interests and clear intentions for strengthening NGO bases or political power in targeted communities. A lack of performance measurement indicators, transparency, accountability, and mechanisms to safeguard against corruption lead to inappropriate utilization of humanitarian aid.
More: alertnet.org
